Geospatial Assessment of Soil Erosion Risk Under Different LULC Categories in the Silabati River Basin, India

Cosmos: A Journal of Geography

Cosmos: A Journal of Geography

A National, Peer-reviewed, Quarterly Journal

ISSN: 3048-9938

Call For Paper - Volume - 2 Issue - 3 (July - September 2025)
Article Title

Geospatial Assessment of Soil Erosion Risk Under Different LULC Categories in the Silabati River Basin, India

Author(s) RATAN PAL, Narayan Chandra Jana.
Country
Abstract

Soil erosion is an ongoing environmental challenge majorly caused by changes to land use and land cover (LULC). Acknowledging how LULC drives soil erosion rates is vital to effective land management and conservation planning. Geospatial technologies, such as remote sensing (RS) and geographic information systems (GIS), offer highly accurate, cost-effective, and time-efficient ways of assessing soil erosion. This study indicates that barren land is particularly susceptible to soil erosion, with an Erosion Susceptibility Index (ESI) score of 4.39, followed by agricultural land at 1.28, further emphasizing the need for effective soil conservation measures as soon as possible. Other LULC categories, including built-up areas, vegetation cover, and river and water bodies, have an Erosion Susceptibility Index (ESI) score below one, signaling minimal erosion risk. To reduce soil degradation, it's essential to employ sustainable land management strategies like afforestation, contour farming, and watershed management. Continuous monitoring with advanced geospatial techniques will significantly enhance erosion prediction and enable informed decision-making, underlining the significance of incorporating technological advancements into conservation policies to maintain long-term soil health and productivity.

Area Geomorphology
Published In Volume 2, Issue 1, March 2025
Published On 27-03-2025
Cite This PAL, R., & Jana, N. C. (2025). Geospatial Assessment of Soil Erosion Risk Under Different LULC Categories in the Silabati River Basin, India. Cosmos: A Journal of Geography, 2(1), pp. 99-109.

PDFView / Download PDF File